Saturday, March 28, 2015

Foxcatcher: Magic Mike vs. 'The Nose'


Let's just get it out in the open, Channing Tatum: not bad on the eyes. However, his portrayal of Olympic gold medalist, Mark Schultz in Foxcatcher gave him the opportunity to showcase his talent as a dramatic actor. I am used to seeing him in corny action films or silly comedies like 21 Jump Street and Magic Mike, however he was really able to push his limits and give a respectable performance.
Foxcatcher was a proving ground for Mark Ruffalo as well, and he was sensational as Mark Schultz’ older brother, Dave. I have never been disappointed watching him on screen since he easily morphs into each character. For instance, Thanks for Sharing is a story which follows a group of recovering sex addicts as they struggle with daily battles against the disease. Mark Ruffalo’s character was one of the recovering addicts; he looked hard, like he had been through the ringer, and he held his body conveying that same message. However, in The Kids Are Alright, he was laid back, lackadaisical, and somewhat carefree. And in Foxcatcher, his eyes are the only thing that give him away as himself. The best way to describe him is as a chameleon and the only way to understand is to go on a Mark Ruffalo movie binge.

I was also looking forward to seeing Steve Carell in a more serious role. Carell is very well known for comedy and he is one of the best, but it is much more interesting to see someone step out of their comfort zone. Carell did this a bit in Dan in Real Life and The Way Way Back (which I highly recommend), but both were more “dramedies” than true “dramas”.

 Based on a sad true story, Foxcatcher is the telling of the events leading up to the murder of Dave Schultz. It begins a few years after the Schultz brothers both win an Olympic gold medal for wrestling in 1984. Mark seems to live in his brother’s shadow seemingly lacking his own life; he is insecure, simple, and reserved. Dave, a family man, is the complete reverse of Mark; he is serious, soft spoken, and self-assured. They are night and day, but Mark relies on and looks up to his brother as they wrestle together, practicing for upcoming competitions. Mark is called to pay a visit to Du Pont, played by Carell, whose mother owns Foxcatcher Farm, an equestrian training center. Du Pont, an eclectic narcissist and mama’s boy, invites Mark to come and train with him to prepare for the 1988 Olympics in Seoul. Mark moves to Foxcatcher Farm, leaving his brother behind. After a while, Mark becomes Du Pont’s toy, using Mark to make himself look good. After a bit of this, Mark becomes depressed and resentful, drinking and doing drugs, rather than getting ready for his competitions. Eventually, Dave comes to coach at Foxcatcher Farm. Dave encourages Mark to change his lifestyle and focus on his training. Mark realizes Du Pont has selfish motives which boils down to him leaving the farm. Unfortunately Dave stays and eventually is murdered by John Du Pont. Just a few short months after Dave’s passing, Mark goes on to compete in and win a competition for the UFC.  

Being extremely versatile is one factor that qualifies someone as "talented". Foxcatcher allows actors who have already demonstrated their abilities in a particular field, to stretch themselves and prove that they offer more to their craft. 7/10

 

Tuesday, March 24, 2015

The Disappearance of Eleanor Rigby

James McAvoy and Jessica Chastain star in The Disappearance of Eleanor Rigby, which is actually three separate films that tell the story of a married couples' strained relationship from different points of view. Chastain, who recently starred in Intersteller, is a talented actress who is quickly becoming a household name. I first saw her in The Help, where she played the charismatic and tolerant Celia Foote and more recently, one of my husband's favorite movies, Zero Dark Thirty. McAvoy, mostly known in America for his role as the young Charles Xavier in X-Men: First Class and the like, is continually underrated, mostly performing in British films. It is exciting to see him in a story like this, one that pushes him into the American spotlight.

From reading other reviews about this project, there is no particular order that is recommended, but one suggested to start with The Disappearance of Eleanor Rigby: Him because Her is much more melancholy. I found this to be helpful since it sort of eased me into the story and prepared me for the especially emotional HerHim is told from the perspective of McAvoy's character, Conor. The story picks up six months after Conor and his wife, Eleanor, lose their infant son. Conor runs a restaurant that is on its last leg while Eleanor tries desperately to cope with their loss. She battles depression, and after an attempt at suicide, she disappears from Conor's life, leaving him alone to cope with her absence, as well as the loss of their son. During this time, he has to make decisions about his failing business, repair the relationship with his dad and his best friend, as well as, finally weed through his son's belongings. As sad as this seems, it actually forces him to deal with his feelings and put the pieces of his disheveled life back together.

The Disappearance of Eleanor Rigby: Her follows Eleanor during her break from Conor. It begins as she attempts to end her life and follows her as she tries to put her it back together. During this time, she stays with her parents, sister, and young nephew while attending NYU, where she takes classes just to "take classes," cuts her hair, and becomes free-spirit. One of the classes Eleanor takes is a psychology class, focusing on identity. Her professor, HTGAWM's Viola Davis, becomes her trusted confidant. She attempts to rebuild her life while trying to distance herself from Conor. Just like Conor, Eleanor needs the time to gather the shattered pieces of her former self and try to put them back as best as possible.

There is a third version, The Disappearance of Eleanor Rigby: Them, which, from what I read, is pieces of the two films cut together. I didn't feel that I needed to watch it, although I may at some point. I will amend this if I get around to watching it.

Overall, the two movies are well done and easy to get into and the story is beautiful and sad at the same time. There is no "rulebook" for dealing with the loss of a child. This is an example of how one couple dealt with tragedy. It wouldn't be fair for me to say what I would do since I don't have children, and thusly have not lost any of them. But that's a conversation for another day. 7/10





Thursday, March 12, 2015

The Theory of Everthing

After the Academy Awards, I decided I wanted to see all of the films nominated this year. So, last Sunday I rented The Theory of Everything, snuggled up with my mom & sister, and watched one of the most impressive films I have ever seen.

It opens with Hawking, played by Eddie Redmayne, as a gifted, young, cosmology student at Cambridge who meets and falls in love with Jane Wilde, a charismatic art student, played by Felicity Jones. Hawking receives devastating news early in the relationship: a diagnosis of ALS and a grim prognosis of only 2 years to live. Despite this death sentence, Jane marries Stephen and they start a family. Stephen's body slowing deteriorates, requiring Jane to become his full time caregiver, along with caring for their children
and finishing her studies. While his body wilts, his mind still functions at full capacity and he completes his doctorate, studying the origin of time. Even when he can no longer talk, he uses a computer that tracks his eye movement to communicate and publish his works. Essentially, the story follows the ups & downs of his relationship with Jane and their struggle with his awful disease. He was given 2 years to live in 1963 and is still alive today. Although wheelchair bound and reliant on a ventilator, his mind is still incredibly sharp.

The performance Redmayne gave portraying the intelligent Dr. Stephen Hawking was absolutely brilliant. I was surprised when he won the Academy Award for Best Actor, to say the least, since there were many nominees that seemed to deserve it. Birdman was getting a lot attention, so I sort of figured Michael Keaton was a shoe-in for the win. However, now that I have seen The Theory of Everything, my tune has changed. Redmayne's performance as a progressing ALS patient was incredibly accurate. The way he held his body and face, as well as, his communication degradation while still staying in character was impressive. He certainly deserved the Oscar he earned. Everyone must see The Theory of Everything. EVERYONE. 9.8/10